On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 09:41 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote: > On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 02:25 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote: > > I maintain a package that links to libcurl, openvrml-player. A recent > > curl update changed the library version from libcurl.so.3 to > > libcurl.so.4. yum installed this update (on Fedora 7) without squawking. > > curl-7.16.1 and newer which bumps soname to libcurl.so.4 has been around > for a while (since Jan 29 2007) and all of the packages, I was aware of, > dependent on libcurl.so.3 were rebuilt prior to F7 release. I haven't > released any curl update to F7 yet. openvrml-player-0.16.4-2.fc7--which shows a build date of May 2, 2007--depends on libcurl.so.3. > > Either I've done something wrong in the spec file for openvrml, or... > > something worse. Can anyone shed some light on this? > > I don't know how openvrml is dependent on libcurl, but just rebuild > should help here as the API hasn't been changed much by the upstream. > (only some obsolete and compatibility symbols removed) I know; and a new release of openvrml is in testing. (Any way I can expedite getting this pushed to updates?) The point was, Why is my system in this state? It may be the case that I didn't get libcurl via an update; rather, it got upgraded from the DVD by the Fedora 7 installer. In this sort of situation, I'm not sure what's supposed to happen. -- Braden McDaniel e-mail: <braden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <http://endoframe.com> Jabber: <braden@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
