On Monday, 04 June 2007 at 20:36, Warren Togami wrote: > This thread contains only strawman ideas to solicit ideas and opinions > for Bodhi. > > NOTE: This mail talks only about how updates-testing tickets in bodhi > behave after they become updates-testing. The controversial matter of > whether a package is required to go into updates-testing is a separate > matter to be discussed and ratified during Thursday's FESCo meeting. > > Idea: updates-testing Autopush after Timeout > ============================================ > 1) Bodhi should auto-push updates-testing after a time-out period. Definitely. As long as no negative comments were entered. > 2) Bodhi interface allows others to comment on the goodness/badness of a > test update. > 3) Bodhi interface allows others to declare a test update broken, which > freezes the auto-push after timeout. > 4) Package maintainer or admins can override this and push anyway. Sounds good. > Idea: Timeout Default, Configurable? > ==================================== > Default updates-testing timeout is 7 days. Package maintainer may set a > different timeout period (i.e. 4, 9 or 14 days), or turn off the timeout > entirely. 7 days is a bit long, but as long as it's configurable, I have no objections. > Idea: Anonymous Commenting +1 Regards, R. -- Fedora Extras contributor http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DominikMierzejewski Livna contributor http://rpm.livna.org MPlayer developer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
