Re: Disttags are nice, save the disttags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 07:09:11 Axel Thimm wrote:
Let's not assume packagers are dump package monkeys. Packages from
*Core* have been the ones that didn't carry disttags, Extras always
did to an extreme high percentage from day one. And there were not
really 10% worth of the whole distribution new packages in Core each
release, these were packages *consciously* moved to using disttags by
@redhat.com employees.

Many core packages picked up dist tags because reviewers recommended them and so packagers just added that with the rest of the stuff they had to change. Seriously I be if we polled all the packagers whom use dist tags, the majority would state something along the line of "the rest of the repo does" or "I use them on all my other packages so now it's consistant" or "the spec generated for me already had it, I didn't know what it was so I didn't remove it".

* I kept getting patches where people kept adding a disttag.
* Some people actually added it into my package "for me".
* To make everyone STFU.

are my reasons. I've had no problems maintaining a proper upgrade path with all the crazy mozilla/seamonkey/firefox/thunderbird stuff all the way back to RHEL2. Dist tag is there not because it saves me time with packaging but because it wastes less time listening to others whine about it.


I highly highly doubt each and every dist tag was a result of a well thought out process that investigated the long term effects and usefulness of having a dist tag in the spec.

Agreed.


And the people that added %{?dist} to the templates (Ville?) aren't
that unconscious either. ;)

So one maintainer decides that dist tags are useful for every single new package in Fedora, and is /right/ about every single new package in Fedora? I think not. It's great that it is there and shows how to properly use it. However just assuming that everybody KNOWS what it is there for when making a new package and understands the consequences of using it is pretty laughable.

Agreed.

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux