Axel Thimm wrote, at 06/04/2007 06:45 PM +9:00: > which is just great! > > I didn't realize that the updates system had such a functionality, I > thought the bugzillas and cves should just be referenced for humans! > > The updates system is getting so much bashing these days, am I the > only one that really likes it? :=) > > (just a minor nitpicking if Luke's watching: the version's field in > CLOSED/*RELEASE should include the release, not only the version > field) > One more comment: ------------------------------------------------------------ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242349 updates@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|ERRATA |NEXTRELEASE Fixed In Version|0.4-2 |0.4 ------------------------------------------------------------ Well, in this case, I closed this bug by myself as CLOSED ERRATA, and after that updates system changed the resolution. I think that there is a general confusion about NEXTRELEASE and ERRATA, but in this case RESOLUITON must be *ERRATA*, not *NEXTRELEASE*!! QUOTED: NEXTRELEASE The problem described has been fixed *in the next release of the product*, and *is not planned to be fixed in the release against which the bug was filed*. Include information on the release in which this was fixed in the summary when a bug is closed to this resolution. ERRATA The problem described has been fixed and will be available as an errata update from our support web site. Please check the site to see if it is currently available for download. And. as Axel commented, "Fixed In Version" should contain Version-Release information. Regards, Mamoru -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
