On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:45:10AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Monday 04 June 2007 08:42:28 Axel Thimm wrote: > > I would suggest to consider at least one full rebuild [1] before the > > final freeze (e.g. as part of the pre-freeze process) and of course to > > allow for enough time between the freeze and the GA to shake out any > > bugs that will surface by that process. > > > > [1] "full" = where it makes sense, e.g. not for pure data packages, > > firmwares and other parts that are really not affected by the > > build environment. > > Hasn't this been discussed over and over again within FESCo? I'd much prefer > to make this a case by case basis per release. Can this really be case by case? Or perhaps even from a different POV: If the distribution hasn't changed enough to warrant a rebuild of many packages (for example for F7 we already had 80-90% non-mass rebuilds anyway), then is it worth releasing? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgp7zV3XYoSGR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
