> On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:45:16AM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: >> which is just great! >> >> I didn't realize that the updates system had such a functionality, I >> thought the bugzillas and cves should just be referenced for humans! >> >> The updates system is getting so much bashing these days, am I the >> only one that really likes it? :=) Your not the only one. Personally I have the odd issue with it, but I'm trusting that the 1.1 milestone (see the hosted.fp.o trac) will fill the gaps. >> >> (just a minor nitpicking if Luke's watching: the version's field in >> CLOSED/*RELEASE should include the release, not only the version >> field) That'd be useful > > And maybe automatically set the bug in "NEEDINFO from Reporter" state > when pushing to testing? :) Yes, that would be a good way to encourage people to test the packages (if they choose). On a side comment: I like the close/etc and the needinfo idea, but maybe set it as a per-maintainer or per-update preference? I'm just thinking about the maintainers that may wish to approach bugs different. Something like "Update specified bugs? Yes/Comment/No" (Yes - The works; Comment - Make comments to the bug but do not change statuses; No - Leave it alone) N.J. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
