On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 11:05:28AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > Then the rel-eng would see that (together with the changelog entry), and > > block if something seems dubious, or if it is too late in the freeze. It > > Their ability to do that, under those circumstances, might be limited. > Rel-eng doesn't immediately know if it's too invasive, which is why a > request is sent. Not all changelogs are descriptive. But perhaps Blocking if changelogs are not descriptive enough seems completly reasonable to me (in a period of freeze). > something better could be done, yes. > > Also remember there will be a point in time where things are completely > frozen so that ISOs can be made. During that (relatively) short period > of time, the push feature would be disabled. Of course. This period could be not so short, especially if the next release has been already branched. -- Pat -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
