On Sunday 03 June 2007 10:48:52 Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Let me put it this way: > > In any case an automated check should be implemented (Wrt. EVRs it must > already be present somewhere), but it would at least have to notify the > maintainer: > "Your rpm is breaking EVRs x,y,z ... Release anyway?" > > Unless a security issue is too severe and if build-times are in > "feasible orders" (say 2-3 hrs - Which I would expect to apply to the > vast majority of packages) a maintainer should very carefully consider > whether he really needs to push a packages "RSN", or whether he should > take care about the breakages he is causing (Automated rebuilds of > breaking packages would be an option if wanting to drive this to > extremes) I don't disagree at all. We could use help in implementing such features into Bodhi. Care to help? -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgph25VWbrqRn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly