On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 19:32 +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: > > My biggest question about the whole QA stuff is: while some packages are > nice desktop applications with menu entries, many (most?) new packages > are going to be somewhat obscure libraries, plugins, perl/py modules, > i.e. things that are difficult to test. For example, if i push a new > version of libgnomeuimm26 to updates-testing, will the QA folks know > that the only way to test that is to actually test gcdmaster, workrave, > referencer and wp_tray ? > Obviously not. Which is why the corresponding internal tools used for RHEL errata have a field where the engineer is supposed to fill in QA test instructions. Bodhi doesn't have that (yet ?) -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
