On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 02:37 -0400, Luke Macken wrote: > On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 11:14:51PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Wednesday 30 May 2007 23:08:37 Luke Macken wrote: > > > Not yet implemented. Multi-package update support in the current tool > > > is essentially a hack. We'll need to do this correctly this time around > > > (if we even want to support multi-package updates). > > > > EEEEk! how can we help you get this going? Will be quite necessary. > > Well, based on the way things are designed now, there cannot be a > single update containing multiple packages. So a simple solution to > this problem is to make it trivial to submit and run requests on multiple > updates at once. > > The web form could be altered to allow any number of builds, which would > then create an individual update for each one with the same bugs/cves/notes. > We could then throw checkboxes next to each update in the list and allow people > to request pushes of multiple updates at once. Doing this from a command-line > tool would be even easier. (eg, `bodhi submit <build1>..<buildN>`). > > What do you guys think? Would this be sufficient? You really want the update to have multiple (source) packages associated with it, though -- think about the case where I have a highly interdependent set of packages that are released together upstream, etc. I want to have just one update mail sent listing all of the packages and then also see them grouped together as a set within pup. Otherwise, the fact that multiple packages can use the same updateinfo really doesn't help much and we could have just kept doing srpm-level grouping :-/ Jeremy -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
