Re: ppc64 packages that did not build for dist-fc7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bill Nottingham wrote:
As part of the merge, we bootstrapped and imported Extras for ppc64.

Not all packages built correctly. Logs of the failures are available at:
	http://people.redhat.com/notting/ppc64-rebuild/

Bugs have only been filed for some of these at this point. Common
failure cases are:

- build deps: no ocaml support on ppc64 (being worked on)
- build deps: no mono support on ppc64 (needs excludearch)
- inability to build shared libraries. This is due to ancient libtool
  stuff in the package; a patch can be found at:
     http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154193

The list of packages:

[...]
brasero-0.5.2-1.fc7

"No Package Found for libbeagle-devel >= 0.1.1"

It looks as though beagle is not built for ppc64, from the beagle SPEC file:

# Mono only available on these:
ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64 ppc ia64 armv4l sparc alpha


I'll remove beagle support from brasero for ppc64.

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux