Re: final kernel biult

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 04:34:32PM -0700, Wart wrote:
 > Dave Jones wrote:
 > > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 12:20:15AM +0800, Yuan Yijun wrote:
 > >  > 2007/5/29, Yuan Yijun <bbbush.yuan@xxxxxxxxx>:
 > >  > > Dell e1405/640m (CPU T2300E)
 > >  > > kernel 3190 and 3191, 3206 boots fine.
 > >  > > kernel 3194, 3201, 3207 failed even with maxcups=1
 > >  > >
 > >  > 
 > >  > oops. I owe you a thousand cups of beer.
 > >  > maxcpus=1 works. :)
 > > 
 > > Ok. I'll kick off a 3208 with another suspect patch removed.
 > > 1 down, n to go..
 > 
 > On my Precision M65:
 > 
 > 3207 == bad, unless maxcpus=1
 > 3208 == good

Fascinating.  That patch was in an earlier Fedora kernel before
it found its way into -stable, and I don't recall it having
anywhere near the same amount of problems.

I'll point this out upstream.  Can others with problems confirm
that 3208 works without maxcpus=1 ?

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux