[RFC] Rethinking the branches system? (was: Re: [PATCH] Update to branches system to match recent DistTag change)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 12:27 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> Target isn't quite right either.
> 
> Target for Fedora 7 is dist-fc7-updates-candidate, the macro define is
> fc7.

Again with the rightness.

The proper fix is going to involve adding another field, and the other
change I'd like to implement adds yet another one, so maybe we've
finally outgrown the current implementation branches system. I certainly
don't mind just adding more fields, but the maintainability will suffer.

I don't mind tossing in a bit of documentation with the next patch, but
I want to elicit the opinions of others about this.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux