Axel Thimm wrote: > This is about nx which is a conglomeration of several (8) different > source tarballs. This is a historical design which has some drawbacks > like having to rebuild all 8 "subpackages" when only one changes. > > Now, technically splitting the (source) package into 8 (source) > packages is less the problem, I'm more afraid of having to submit all > 8 pieces and wait for reviews of each one of them. Any chance this > could be special handled by a cvsadmin? Does fesco or some other > instance need to approve? For something like this, how I'd like to see it handled, is one master review bug#, with the 8 specfiles, and label the review as 'Review Request: nx-* - Package split'. N.J. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
