On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 15:03 -0400, Peter Jones wrote: > Andrew Overholt wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 14:49 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > >> and I generated this list: > >> http://linux.duke.edu/~skvidal/misc/what-requires-crazy-files.txt > > > > The Eclipse ones are due to multilib and the inability to Require: > > nvr.arch. > > But they all seem to be (essentially) eclipse-$foo.%{arch} requires > eclipse.%{arch}. Couldn't we do something like: > > %package > Provides: eclipse(%{arch}) > ... > %package -n eclipse-$foo > Requires: eclipse(%{arch}) Maybe. I'm going on vacation tomorrow so I won't have time to look at this, but Ben Konrath may. Eclipse bugs go to him right now so I'm sure he'll comment if something's filed. Andrew
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
