On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 16:52 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 16 May 2007 14:22:30 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > I would have added you as co-maintainer of cvsutils in owners.list > > but apparently the procedures outlined on > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages?action=show&redirect=Extras%2FOrphanedPackages > > also do not apply anymore: > > 1) There has never been a separate Wiki page that covers owners.list. True. But I searched the wiki on "owners" because I had wanted to find out the current way of changing owner and found the page above. > 2) That you find the OrphanedPackages page during your search for > documentation on how to add package co-maintainers or new maintainers > adds confirmation for 1). True, when I found it, the page contained this: 1. Edit '''owners.list''' in Fedora Package CVS and set the ''initialowner'' field of your package to ''extras-orphan[AT]fedoraproject.org'' e-mail address (substitute the [AT] appropriately). This matched with what had been doing ever since FE had existed. > 3) The Fedora Extras community used to be able to control their packages, > including package ownership, co-ownership, and orphans. We used to be > able to handle all that ourselves. But recently, a cage has been set up > for the monkeys. <sigh/> Yes, this incident makes it apparent what certain circles think about the community. > Look in the list archives (February 20th), the message > with the subject "Orphanizing the OrphanedPackages Wiki page") is the > announcement that the page is unmaintained. <sigh> And the page had not be updated. I'd really appreciate some professionalism and some people exhibiting responsibility. </sigh> Ralf -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
