Hi, On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 09:33:06AM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > as far as I understand the new process, there should be a big fat > warning given to Extras maintainers not to update their FE 6 and 5 > packages (except for adding an integer after the dist-tag) Well, that doesn't help in the case of a version bump which is the most often package update class in Fedora (compared to updates to the specfile changes or added/changed patches which keep the version invariant). I'd say try to do both in parallel with priority on F7, so it has a chance to catch up. If you *can* wait for < F7 the better, but F7 shouldn't become a bottleneck for FC6/FE6 maintenance. The policy is anyway that F7 doesn't really need to rebuild FC6 packages, unless you have a Real Good Reason. Personally I'm not a believer of this policy, but maybe you are, so you don't even have to think about upgrade paths :) (Thinking about it this is why this policy was set up ;) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpIK7Zzml5St.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
