On Monday 07 May 2007, Jesse Keating wrote: > > Presumably the maintainer knew that they were breaking upgrade path when > doing the FE6 build, and thus did a build on devel/. Well, I didn't until an hour or so ago. And looks like I'm not the only one who missed it. > organized.... or small amounts of chaos... Thankfully tagging a package > is extremely quick, it just takes time to generate an email. Things go > faster if the rebuilds are to fix NVR only and not "oh, I'm rebuilding, > might as well suck down the latest upstream and introduce a soname bump and > new features and...." Understood, and I'm happy to take your word for it if you're saying the whole shebang is doable. I do however think that the sooner an official reminder and a more explicit explanation about things packagers need to take care of (such as things discussed in this thread, eg. what does it mean if I update a package in FE6 and devel now) than what's currently in the Wiki can be sent, the better. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
