On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 13:22 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > On 07/05/07, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 12:27 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > > > I have created a draft Packaging Guide for Emacs add-on packages here: > > > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/EmacsenAddOns > > > > > > Any comments or suggestions greatfully received. There are a couple of > > > spec file templates included which I hope will be useful. > > > > > > I'd like to get this added to the packaging notes fairly soon - > > > presumably this requires FESCO ratification? > > > > Actually, it needs to go to the Packaging Committee. > > Well, I think it's too verbose and specific to be part of the > packaging guidelines, which are more general in their nature. The > point of this document was to outline "Good Practice" and lower the > intertial barrier to building add-on packages for Emacs. So I'm not > sure where it's best put, and whether it needs to go via Packaging > committee approval or not. > > There seems to be quite a lot of information gathered under > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging that isn't easily accessed but > seems really useful. If it is under Packaging/, the FPC needs to sign off on it. ~spot -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
