On Fri, 4 May 2007 17:44:34 +0200, Laurent Rineau wrote: > On Wednesday 11 April 2007 15:04:59 Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Wednesday 11 April 2007 08:31:15 Axel Thimm wrote: > > > The fc6 tag is really cosmetics in comparison to what we may run into > > > w/o a proper rebuild. In fact we should really keep them (the tags), > > > so when a package explodes the user/bug reporter/bug assignee will be > > > able to identify the distribution the package was built on and perhaps > > > derive that that's the real issue. > > > > With Koji, it is pretty easy to find out EXACTLY what packages were in the > > buildroot to build any given package. The dist tag is not necessary for > > guessing. > > Jesse, > > I was browsing Koji's pages when I discovered that my packages were all > rebuild by you the day before yesterday (2007/05/02). Actually, I discovered > that the tag "f7-merge" is composed of 2998 rebuilds, made by you on > Wednesday: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taginfo?tagID=11 > > I am pretty sure that I have not understood something. Maybe these rebuild > jobs are fake rebuilds, like a kind of copy (I do not know if the build > system can even rebuild almost 3000 packages in one day). > > Can you give a word about that? :-) Your theory is correct. koji needs the "build" information for all its packages to fill database tables. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly