On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 22:33 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: > A couple of questions: > > Jesse Keating wrote, at 05/04/2007 03:15 AM +9:00: > > > Koji will take your build and run with it, you'll see some output on the CLI. > > Your build, if successful, will be tagged with 'dist-fc7'. This is not > > enough to get it into rawhide, as F7 is in continual slush freeze. If you > > need your build to get into rawhide and thus Fedora 7, you need to follow the > > policy http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/DevelFreezePolicy > > here. > > Well, > A. Does this mean that many packages which were approved and were > rebuilt after koji began to work (then marked as 'dist-fc7') > will not be pushed into Fedora 7, > while they will be pushed into Fedora _Extras_ 6/5 as before (usually > within two days)? (i.e. will this cause the situation that > newer packages will appear on FE-5/6, but not on Fedora 7)? Unless you submit a request to rel-eng, yes. You need to have those packages tagged as f7-final if you want them in the release. > > B. There are still many packages which are still waiting for review and > some of them require rpms marked as dist-fc7 as BuildRequires. > If the situation A is true, how can I check if a package can be > rebuilt with mock correctly which I want to review and which > requires dist-fc7 rpms (which are not pushed into public yet)? > > Before koji began to work, mock used to pull such BuildRequires rpms > from > http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/plague-results/fedora-development-extras/ , > which included repodata (marked as "local" repository) and mock could use > such rpms "which were just rebuilt but not formally pushed into public" as > BuildRequires. > > For koji, are there any repodata of dist-fc7 which contains "not formally > pushed rpms" which can be used for mock build needed for package review > as before? (i.e. I want to install "just rebuilt rpms" from repository > like "local" repository as quickly as possible because I _frequently_ > meet the situation in which such "new" rpms are needed for review"). This is a good question that I don't know the answer to. Jesse, Dennis? josh -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
