At the last FESCo meeting, we discussed how FESCo wished the various sub-committees (EPEL, FPC) to report their weekly summaries. The initial proposal was to have the sub-committee send a summary to FESCo at least 24-hours before the FESCo weekly meeting. Then during the FESCo meeting, the chair would simply ask if there were "any objection to this week's report of <group> at http://<url>", and if necessary have a vote on any contentious issues. This works fine for the FPC since they meet on Tuesdays, but since EPEL meets on Wednesday they wouldn't be able to send out a summary in time for that week's FESCo meeting. So instead of having them wait till the following weeks meeting, do we want to have a guideline that on summaries that aren't sent to FESCo in time, FESCo members have 3 business days after the summary is sent to make any objections known? Thanks, /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
