David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 14:39 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: >> I'm not going to support making a libperl subpackage to dodge fixing >> multilib. By doing this, we just slide down the slippery slope of >> avoiding the problem, and relying on dirty hacks instead of solving >> the hard problems. > > I believe you retracted this on IRC, after I pointed out that this is > actually the _fix_ to avoid the dirty hack in RPM which allows the > installation of conflicting files. > > You said we'd go ahead and split the package. But it doesn't seem to > have been done yet -- are we still going ahead with it? I have the split in CVS - I'm waiting for Tom to have a chance to review it before I do a real build. -RN -- Robin Norwood Red Hat, Inc. "The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone." -Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
