On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:54:46PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > o either all packages in i386 are rebuilt for i386 to place their bins > > there, too, and then your argument of not a classical path would > > apply to all i386 system, which outweigh the x86_64 ones, or > > o You have different i386 packages for i386 and x86_64, which is also > > not a good solution, because you lose the QA for the pure i386 > > packages. > > not if you use bin32 on i386 too, making bin a symlink to the primary > arch That would be the first case. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpbJglNXhmZs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
