-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 11:54:47AM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote: >> If possible could the discussion of allowing camlimages, ocamlSDL and >> freetennis (all pending review) [1][2][3] to be packaged with static >> libraries be discussed during the next meeting? I most likely can't >> attend due to the meeting time, but I'd really appreciate a decision. > > I know that it isn't what is said in the guidelines, in the guidelines > it is said that FESCo should approve such things, but in my opinion you > should make your choice as a packager without waiting for FESCo, since in > this case this is a limitation imposed by upstream. Now if there is a > dispute within reviewers then FESCo is needed but if no reviewer objects for > using the static libs, I'd say just do it without waiting for FESCo. Of > course, if FESCo members after looking at the issue have a different > opinion you should reconsider, but I can't see how it could be the case. Okay then, I'll post a note to the 3 bugs soon, and see what happens. - -- N.J. > > -- > Pat > > -- > Fedora-maintainers mailing list > Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGMIfvpldg9bRmG6kRAt9RAKCAsBaVi+7MsQ2th9a55P9loQf1OgCdE/Gz 0WRdcmW7fSSDI3y2SDyE6NE= =8W9R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
