Re: NX/FreeNX maintainer: AWOL?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 16/04/07, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I just did. Some parts like x86_64 support are already in, also some
mismatching lib issues, the update requests and some crashes.

What I know still exists as an issue is printing support, as this
doesn't really exists in upstream either.

One thing I did notice about the nx packaging is that it breaks the
one tarball to one package paradigm, having something like 9 tarballs
rolled into it. Do the sources really all need to be in the build tree
at the same time, or could the packaging be cleaned up?

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux