This is the report on the outcome of the EPEL votings to date. The one that passed needs a ratification by fesco (details are on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/SteeringCommittee/Voting): 1) Rebuild of EPEL5 Topic: The packages currently in EPEL5 got build against RHEL5beta1; the plan is to rebuild them against RHEL5. The question is: how? Winning option: Simply delete the current repo and rebuild all packages 2) Introduction of a repotag Topic: Should EPEL carry a repotag? If yes, the technical details will be delegated to the Packaging Committee. Vote turned down 3) Vetoing fedora-usermgmt until FPC makes a decision Topic: Packages should not use fedora-usermgmt or other non-standard useradd replacements. Vote turned down fesco needs to ratify the outcome of vote 1) above, the turned down votes don't need any ratification of course. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpFUh1625AIQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
