On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 12:22:13PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 09 April 2007, Matt Domsch wrote: > > So, out of 4030 SRPMS total, 66 fail for one reason or another (some > > ExclusiveArch-dependent failures in that list), or ~1.6%, aren't > > building properly. > > Is there a way to file automated bug reports against these? Not really; we did this all manually in the FC5 timeframe for the failed-to-build-with-mock bugs. Just need a generic blocker bug, then individual package bugs that block the blocker bug, then my tool prints out a nice report of what's known to be bad, and what's bad but has no bug filed. > Regarding the packages that built successfully, can you check if > they at least look reasonably similar to the fc6 binary? > We should probably also look into rebuilding packages which > - do not have the same set of files or file permissions > - have different dependencies > - contain files that changed in size more than a given > percentage (e.g. 10%) during recompiling My tool runs rpmlint and rpmdiff against all packages as they're built and leaves the resulting logfiles in the result/ directory of the package. I don't have anything that will parse them for anything though. I'd be happy to run such a parser if it existed (hint hint). Thanks, Matt -- Matt Domsch Software Architect Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
