On So April 8 2007, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > My take: I'm not sure if that's really worth the trouble and we are > quite late in the game for Fedora 7. So maybe we should just ignore this > for Fedora 7 and find a better solution for F8 and later. We can do it for FC8 without at as much traffic as now, given yum-presto is then widely used. Also I doubt, that there will be much confusion, as there are already packages without a disttag and I do not see much confusion about it. Also the fedora-release-notes packages mentions Fedora 5.92 in its summary and description and nobody seems to be confused. Regards, Till
Attachment:
pgpO85CjmIuww.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
