Jesse Keating schrieb:
> On Friday 06 April 2007 07:13:03 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> I dislike a bit that /os/ is below Everything. How about something
>> that's similar to what we have now below "core/{5,6}/"
>>
>> releases/7/
>> /<arch>/
>> /iso/
>> /os/{...}
>> /debug/{...}
>>
>> <arch> = i386, ppc, x86_64, source
>>
>> The Prime, Live and Everything isos could live in the iso directory for
>> each arch.
> Why do you dislike that?
No specific reasons, just a "looks better to me that way" and "is closer
to what we had until now which worked fine up to now -- changing it more
then needed just confuses people for no good reasons" feeling. Well,
maybe a small detail: you don't have to type the "Everything" part of
the url when doing network installs.
> The idea was that Everything/ has the exploaded
> content for every arch we build for, regardless if it is pulled into a spin
> or not. There wouldn't be any exploaded tree for the spins, as that
> duplicates data and the iso itself can be used in a loopback manner for
> network installs.
Well, all that is afaics possible with the layout I outlined, too. (and
I didn't want any exploaded spins trees, too -- only the repo with all
the packages in it)
> Having all the isos in the same directory makes nfsiso
> installs tricky as anaconda might end up mounting too many isos.
The make subdirectories for each spin below iso and the problem is gone.
Cu
thl
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
