On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 16:47 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Monday 02 April 2007 16:52:47 Hans de Goede wrote: > > Matthew Miller wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 10:18:49PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > >> Hmm, I understand, but I find this a bit harsh, I actually find Peter's > > >> striving for a minimal minimal install a good thing, including the not > > >> including 600k of release notes? Can't we have a text only version of > > >> them or something like that?? > > > > > > Aren't the release notes docs? > > > > Good point, they should be marked %doc, in which case on a true minimal > > install without doc instalation they wouldn't take any diskspace. > > > > $ rpm -qd fedora-release-notes |wc -l > 104 > [jkeating@reducto ~]$ rpm -ql fedora-release-notes |wc -l > 152 > > Most are marked as docs. I haven't looked to see what isn't yet. The scrollkeeper OMFs and the .desktop file for "About Fedora" most likely make up the majority of what isn't marked as docs. Since those aren't going to work without the backing XML/HTML files, perhaps we should just mark the remainder as %doc. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PaulWFrields irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
