On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 11:35:17 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 11:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Per a customer suggestion, I recently separated mysql's client libraries > > out of the base "mysql" RPM into a new "mysql-libs" RPM. I thought this > > would be a trivial change, but it seems "yum upgrade" fails to cope: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234712 > > > > Would someone slip me a clue on what I did wrong? I suppose I'm lacking > > some specfile directive, but I dunno what... > > > so you're preserving the mysql pkg just splitting some items out of it > into mysql-libs? > > So there's no need for an obsolete. > > In the above bug, as I mentioned in the comment, was the machine where > the problem happened multilib? Most likely. Because the new "mysql" package is available as x86_64 only, while mysql-libs.i386 and mysql-devel.i386 are available for multi-lib. An old mysql.i386 would not be updated, but would cause conflicts. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
