On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:22:15 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 11:23:34AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:34:02 -0400 (EDT), buildsys wrote: > > > > > limb AT jcomserv.net: > > > ettercap > > > FE5 > FE6 (0:0.7.3-13.3.fc5 > 0:0.7.3-12.fc6) > > > FE5 > FE7 (0:0.7.3-13.3.fc5 > 0:0.7.3-12.fc7) > > > > > > gnubg > > > FE5 > FE7 (0:20061119-8.fc5.2 > 0:20061119-7.fc7) > > > FE6 > FE7 (0:20061119-8.fc6 > 0:20061119-7.fc7) > > > > > > xmoto-edit > > > FE5 > FE6 (0:0.2.4-6.1.fc5 > 0:0.2.4-6.fc6) > > > FE5 > FE7 (0:0.2.4-6.1.fc5 > 0:0.2.4-6.fc7) > > > > > > miker5slow AT grandecom.net: > > > etherape > > > FE5 > FE6 (0:0.9.7-4.1.fc5 > 0:0.9.7-4.fc6) > > > FE5 > FE7 (0:0.9.7-4.1.fc5 > 0:0.9.7-4.fc7) > > > > The issues with "ettercap", "xmoto-edit" and "etherape" are one of the > > infamous problems when adding a %dist tag. > > Ehem. All of the above have the same inequality relation if you drop > the disttag ... Impossible, because then you cannot tag and build the packages in the way they have been built above. Only due to the added %disttag, it was possible to keep the rest of %release equal across multiple branches. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
