Re: Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2007-03-22

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 23 March 2007 09:05:33 Tomas Janousek wrote:
> And what difference does it make? I don't think your statement about the
> position of the dist tag is true. Since 4.1 and 4.fc6 are compared the same
> as 4.1 and 4, it's ok. It's common practice to add minor release numbers
> for spec changes etc. as long as one is sure it won't break the order of
> versions.

Yes, but when the same version is shipped on multiple branches, you have to 
add your minor version bump after the dist-tag, not before it.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgpCO6DoOaL8p.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux