Le mardi 20 mars 2007 à 10:51 -0800, Jeff Spaleta a écrit : > The real question is how do we do that functionally. There is one > comps file right now. Do we > give a lot of people the authority to poke around inside that file. > I'm not sure I like that approach, I'd be afraid of inexperienced > people accidentally breaking the comps syntax, unless we can find a > way to toolize a syntax verifier as part of the check in process, like > what Jesse has suggested to me in irc. We already have a syntax verifier http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/comps/comps-cleanup.xsl?root=extras (written because people kept breaking FE comps) And we could easily do more if the people responsible for the various upstreams (rpm, anaconda, yum) could bother looking at the existing proposals : - actual comps XML schema https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-November/msg00426.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-November/msg00443.html - more radical stuff http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Comps/PackageGroupEnhancements > Thoughts? Will only happen if comps-using upstreams participate Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
