David Woodhouse (dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > That makes a certain amount of sense. Although I don't really think we > need to offer the "runtime" option -- what's the point in a bunch of > libraries which never get used? Just pull them in if they're required, > surely -- either by a -devel package or by an executable? Let the > default be 'none', which gives you nothing but the special cases like > gdb and strace. Well, there *is* non-RPM software that you may want to support as well (moreso on x86_64 than ppc64). Also, I suspect things like PAM and NSS modules would be in the same bucket as gdb, strace. Bill -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
