On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 21:40 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 03:30:15PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > [...] it is pretty clear that there is not a small amount of work to > > be done, and I'd really rather not interrupt the mad dash to get > > things in before the Test3 freeze, since that is the Feature Freeze > > as well. [...] > > > Basically I want to give people a status update on where things are going, and > > what work still needs to be done, and what our expectations are. I welcome > > input around when and how to flip the switch and whether or not dropping > > this "feature" in after the feature freeze is acceptable. > > I'd argue that this feature is a meta-feature (e.g. it should not > really be observable when someone grabs the final product what kind of > buildsystem was used), so perhaps the feature-freeze does not really > apply to this part. So, I think it's acceptable to add it after test3. I just want to make sure that we don't get into a situation where we've waited until after Test3 and then it's too late to make the change. --Chris -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
