Brian Pepple schrieb: > [...] > Packaging Committee Report > * FESCo approved the Packaging Committee's guidelines regarding: > * InitScripts proposal: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/InitScripts > * BuildRoot proposal: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/BuildRoot Just wondering: Why isn't the PC sending any reports/summaries to fedora-maintainers anymore (or did I miss them all in the past weeks?)? That was part of the arrangement between FESCo and FPC iirc; to quote http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Schedule "A representative from the packaging committee will send a report after each committee meeting to fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx for public discussion. In order to give ample discussion time, this report should be sent no less than 24 hours before the next FESCo meeting; if the report is late, the veto period will be extended by one additional FESCo meeting. FESCo may also extend the veto period if there is still ongoing discussion." That text should be adjusted if the arrangement got changed. But I think Meeting summaries from the FPC with a short notice what got accepted (like Brian did in his FESCo report) are quite important. Yes, I know that it's hard work (I did FESCo reports myself for quite some time), and no, I'm not volunteering to do it myself, as I don't follow the FPCs meetings/discussions that closely (and that's the reasons why I'd like to have a summary). CU thl -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
