>>>>> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:33:11 +0100, >>>>> "AT" == Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: AT> On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 09:03:24AM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >> >> Le Mer 28 février 2007 21:00, Enrico Scholz a écrit : >> >> > afaik, 'fonts.alias' has nothing todo with stateless or non-stateless. >> > This >> > file won't be touched by any system program (in opposite to fonts.dir and >> > fonts.scale) >> >> Those won't really be touched either. mkfontscale/mkfontdir output is not >> too reliable, people use "known good & tested" versions of fonts.dir >> instead of dynamic generation AT> Does it perhaps make sense to un%config them? Unmarking %config from fonts.dir and fonts.scale will makes trouble on upgrading since xfs initscript runs ttmkfdir/mkfontscale and mkfontdir automatically when it detects the updates on the directory where the fonts installed. Probably better keep the real fonts under /usr, which won't be touched by the hand at all and move fonts.* files under /var or /etc perhaps. -- Akira TAGOH
Attachment:
pgp39peRw3X1K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
