On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 01:42:40PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 08:36:53PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > For all the bizarre decisions apt-rpm can occasionally do in depsolving, > > this kind of thing it does rather well. Depending on various details and > > the used method, it'll either hold back from updating a package or remove > > if there's no other way to solve the issue. Additionally with > > --fix-missing it's much more forgiving about partially out-of-sync mirrors > > than yum is. > > Yeah, it's nice how APT is happy to totally eat all of your system so it can > reduce it to a consistent set. :) You can add a mode where only updates are limited to a subset without dependency problems, so that broken rawhide pushes can still be consumed. regards, Florian La Roche -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
