Christian Iseli wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:45:15 -0500, Warren Togami wrote:
This procedure is meant to be for *BOTH* Merge and regular package
reviews. Please comment.
I mostly like it. My only gripe is about the toggling between
fedora-review? and fedora-review-
I do not think it brings much. I'd prefer the flag to stay at ?
(corresponding to the FE-REVIEW state) and simply use NEEDINFO/MODIFIED
BZ status if deemed necessary by the parties involved.
I'd prefer the fedora-review- flag to be used in place of FE-DEADREVIEW
(#201449), or some similar purpose.
+1, if not +100, this toggling between fedora-review? and fedora-review-
is totally unnecesarry as heen be said by me and several others several
times already, why o why is noone listening, or atleast explaining why
this is actually necessary?
Regards,
Hans
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
