On Tuesday 20 February 2007 17:44, Christian Iseli wrote: > I do not think it brings much. I'd prefer the flag to stay at ? > (corresponding to the FE-REVIEW state) and simply use NEEDINFO/MODIFIED > BZ status if deemed necessary by the parties involved. > > I'd prefer the fedora-review- flag to be used in place of FE-DEADREVIEW > (#201449), or some similar purpose. +1 -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpHET4WPnL65.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
