On Monday 19 February 2007 11:36, Ville Skyttä wrote: > In previous releases, placing FCX in maintenance mode happened IIRC at > FC(X+2)test2 time. But I suppose maintenance mode as the concept it used > to be has disappeared along with Legacy. > > Which way shall it be for FC5, and what are the plans for FC6+ in the > future? Incidentally, I was looking for this information a few days back, > but couldn't find it. It'd be good to have this documented somewhere > prominently. Something to add to this week's FESCo agenda? It does need to be decided. It was left somewhat in the air from the Fedora Summit where we introduced the idea of a 13~ month livespan, going from Test2 to 1 month past GOLD for a lifespan. We punted on any decision wrt FC-5 (and even 6) at that point. Given that we still don't have an ability for community folks to contribute updates to existing Fedora releases, I think this really needs to be answered by RH engineering management for how much work they are willing to sign up their engineers for, and that really isn't a decision that FESCO can make. We can certainly decide what should happen to Extras packages in accordance with the Core lifespan. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgprBHx3TuUpQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
