On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 06:59:24 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > FYI, I reworked the last proposal and some FESCo members looked over it > and seemed to agree with it so far, too. See > http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Schedule/EncourageComaintainership > for details. Please comment. "at least three maintainers" looks like an awful lot in case of simple packages. I know it's hard to define "simple", but still... "Maintainers should work towards getting at least one co-maintainer." I don't like this too much. I think the burden should be placed on would-be maintainers to strive to be accepted as co-maintainers, not on overloaded maintainers to be forced to go hunting for co-maintainers. CHF 0.02 C -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
