Re: perl-XML-parser vs perl(XML::parser)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: perl-XML-parser vs perl(XML::parser)
From: "Julian Sikorski" <belegdol@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 13:14:07 +0000
Cc:
In-reply-to: <1171199372.22648.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <9b1b20e70702110504i51148b18i7841d4c8d301969b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1171199372.22648.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for the info. I'll start to update all my packages accordingly then.

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

References:
- perl-XML-parser vs perl(XML::parser)
  - From: Julian Sikorski
- Re: perl-XML-parser vs perl(XML::parser)
  - From: Ralf Corsepius

Prev by Date: Preferred (smartest?) way of dealing with packages installing docs into %{_docdir}
Next by Date: Still some proxy problems (plague)
Previous by thread: Re: perl-XML-parser vs perl(XML::parser)
Next by thread: Preferred (smartest?) way of dealing with packages installing docs into %{_docdir}
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [KDE Users]

Powered by Linux