Re: RFC: Review with Flags (Version 4)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 08 February 2007 06:55, Warren Togami wrote:
> I think this procedure should be good enough for both Mass Review and
> general package review for an interim period, prior to a better design
> in Package Database.  I would like to ratify this process late Thursday
> if possible, so please comment soon if you see problems.

Just a quick note / implementation detail:

> Possible Process Optimizations
> ==============================
> 1. Changing fedora-review to ? auto-sets Assigned pointer to self.  This
> is taking the review.
> 2. Changing fedora-review to + should auto-set Assigned pointer to
> owner.  This is a little more difficult because it isn't always obvious
> who the owner is (especially in Mass Reviews), but this may be the
> reporter in regular reviews later.

3. Bugzilla needs to be fixed not to send two mails every time a flag changes 
state.  Random example:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-review/2007-February/msg01538.html
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-review/2007-February/msg01539.html

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux