On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 08:42:09AM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thursday 08 February 2007 08:30, Joe Orton wrote: > > Use of $RPM_SOURCE_DIR is not covered in the packaging guidelines nor in > > the review guidelines. It's flagged by rpmlint, which, as the > > guidelines *do* say, is often wrong. > > And it has been pointed out to you many times _why_ the use of RPM_SOURCE_DIR > is bad. You can't have this both ways, Jesse. The packaging committee has clearly *not* agreed a policy on use of $RPM_SOURCE_DIR since the guidelines are silent on this. Do you agree with that statement? Various people have pointed out some positive and some negative aspects of $RPM_SOURCE_DIR in this thread. Do you agree with that statement? [Truly, we have become debian-devel. Congrats to all.] joe -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
