On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 08:31 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > That may solve this particular question, but I for one would still very > much like to see the whole process documented in a clear step by step > way, much like the FE contributers guide. > > (Unlike others?) No, you're not alone. Though I hope to have been able to follow (at least most of it), I am also quite confused when it comes to details, e.g.: * How is this "flags thing" supposed to work/to be used? Why was this necessary at all? Though I believe to have understood the idea, ATM, I find it more confusing than helpful. * Some people mentioned some "overview wiki" - where is it? * Will Core packages physically be moved into Extras CVS after they passed review? If yes, when will this happen? * I am observing RH/Core people more or less _silently_ abandoning/ orphaning packages as part of the Core/Extras review. Though it's natural to see packages being abandoned/adopted during release preps. I'd really prefer @redhat.com's doing this openly in public with a loud and clear "abandoning mail" * How are Extra->Core mergers, respective RH adoptions of current Extra packages supposed to be handled? ... Ralf -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
