On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 09:31 +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > > And as for the meta-discussion here, I think it's important to realize > > that there's always going to be some package that's a legitimate > > exception to just about any guideline. As long as this stuff is > > accepted by review (or by committee where necessary) and properly > > documented in the specfile then everything should be fine. > > +1 > No need to start an argument when things out of guidelines are done > for a (documented) reason Just to avoid any doubt: I'd like to reiterate what I already told Till in private -- he was entirely _correct_ to raise the question here, since I was overly terse when I closed the original bug and _didn't_ provide fully coherent reasoning. Hopefully I've done that sufficiently now, and if anyone disagrees with my decision then they have enough information with which to argue. I'm entirely unoffended by being questioned -- what _would_ offend me, on the other hand, would be to ever hear that someone _refrained_ from asking questions because they thought I might react poorly. -- dwmw2 -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
