On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 23:06 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: > Quite a few packages produce useless -debuginfos nowadays. In addition to > empty -debuginfos, a debuginfo package that contains some *.debug files but > no sources is also quite likely not honoring $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, and if so, also > very likely to have been built without compiler generated security features. > Looks like reviewers should pay more attention to these issues (although they > can obviously be introduced after reviews too). > > More info, including some suggestions how to fix common cases: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo "find-debuginfo.sh processes only files that are executable when it's run" I think that another obvious reason for empty debuginfo is non owner writable .so files as well as non-executable ones. C. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
